Toy makers may win lead-testing exemption

Rules on lead threatened to hurt those who create handcrafted items


Update 9-2-9  by Susie Stramler   (for a lively discussion on this, please stop by our forum and give your opinions on this horrendous piece of legislation)
Many people know what CPSIA (Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act) is but there are many others out there that still do not have a clue.  CPSIA is an Act that was signed by President Bush in 2008 that affects manufactures and any person that sells items geared for children under the age of 12.  This includes but is not limited to: crafter's who make items for children (even hair bows), resellers of items, second hand stores and even the neighborhood yard sale.  http://www.kansascity.com/444/story/1395184.html 
 
Might want to read before you have that yard sale
Link For Resale Handbook
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/thrift/thrguid.pdf
 
Many people are just discovering how the CPSIA affects them. This article is intended to help you find (or at least point you in the right direction) the information you need all in one place.

First of all, you can go to the CPSC website and add yourself to their email list so that you will get all the updated information directly to your email. This is very helpful, as the CPSC issues new statements and guidelines quite often. You won't have to search for the answers because they come directly to your email!
 *****I highly recommend this as information can and does change daily

Here's the CPSC website link to the info on the CPSIA
On the top left corner is a link to subscribe their email list.
http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/cpsia.html

Here's some links that should give you all the info current info you need.

CPSIA guidance for small businesses/crafter's
http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.pdf
 
Threading Your Way Through the Labeling Requirements Under the Textile and Wool Acts
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/textile/bus21.shtm

Tracking labels
http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/sect103policy.pdf
I have seen many comments from people thinking at this point they really do not have to do anything to their products because some are still fighting this act.  They are wrong! Please read the following information that came from the FAQ link below.
 
CPSC to Enforce New CPSIA Requirements for Children’s Products Effective August 14, 2009
 http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09306.html
 
The law requires that one year after enactment, or August 14, 2009, manufacturers of children’s products must place permanent marks on their product providing the information specified. Thus, the Commission staff believes that the tracking label requirement applies to children’s products manufactured on or after August 14, 2009.  Hang tags or adhesive labels will not work, they have to be permanent.
 
As you will see, some items have been exempted from the "testing" but those items still must have a tracking label.  The way I understand it these labels can be any size (they must be readable) and the minimum that the tracking label must have is:  the city, state/territory, the country the item was made in and the production or completion date for the item.  You should have records showing where you bought the items you used, etc. in case one of your items needs to be tracked for one reason or another.
 
Remember this is an additional label that is now required and does not take the place of labels that are already required by federal law such as care or fabric content or chocking hazard warnings.  You can check category by category at  http://www.cpsc.gov/ , but you do have to dig around.
 

I think this is what is confusing so many people, your supplies won't need to be tested until February 2010, they did put a one year stay on testing. However, you should be certain that your supplies fall under the lead limits.  But .. ALL items manufactured on or after August 14, 2009 do need labels.

FAQ
http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/sect103.html#103q8
 
Here is a list of items exempt from the lead testing as of this date:

Table B - These materials or components can be used (separately or
in combination) and sold
(provided they have not been treated or altered
or undergone any processing that could result in the addition of lead)
:

 

  • Wood
  • Other natural materials including coral, amber, feathers, fur, and untreated leather
  • Yarn, dyed or undyed
  • Dyed or undyed textiles (cotton, wool, hemp, nylon, etc.), including children’s fabric products, such as baby blankets, and non-metallic thread and trim. This does not include products that have rhinestones or other ornaments that may contain lead or that have fasteners with possible lead content (such as buttons, metal snaps, zippers or grommets).
  • Children’s books printed after 1985 that are conventionally printed and intended to be read, as opposed to used for play
  • Certain educational materials, such as chemistry sets
  • Precious gemstones: diamond, ruby, sapphire or emeralds
  • Semiprecious stones provided that the mineral or material is not based on lead and is not associated with any mineral based on lead
  • Natural or cultured pearls
  • Surgical steel
  • Gold, of at least 10 karats
  • Silver, at least 925/1000 pure
  • Platinum, palladium, rhodium, osmium, iridium, and ruthenium
 
 
One interesting development that happened is that Mattel is being allowed to do their own testing, read about it here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090827/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_product_testing_mattel
 
Want to make your voice known?  Here is the CPSC contact webpage address:
http://www.cpsc.gov/about/contact.html
 
Hope this has given you some information that you can use to help better understand how this Act is and will affect you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(see article below) I was just reading about these recent laws that are forcing companies to have their toys tested for lead. Don't know if this is really necessary and I think that this lead problem might have been blown out of proportion. I agree that children should be protected from lead, but there might be groups or individuals out there who stand to make some big bucks because of this. I am always skeptical about some of these new laws where you have to do this, buy that, wear this, don't wear that, etc. because I think that the producers/manufacturers of these items, etc., are the ones initiating the bills that create these new laws.

Anyhow, went off track here. There are quite a few people in the Arts and Crafts world out there who are making their toys OR are importing them from China, etc. Here an article about having to get your toys inspected for lead. Life is tough out there for the vendors and arts and crafts people and things might get tougher.

For more information on this please check  http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-4040  This is about the HR4040 bill that was passed in December.


Here is what somebody wrote on their blog.  This is from a fellow 'crafter' and is interesting to read.  http://pinaforesandknickerbockers.blogspot.com/2008/12/disturbing-law.html
http://babyswagspr.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/supporting-small-businesses-cpsia-law-issues/   

Help Save Handmade Toys in the USA from the CPSIA - Hand-made Toy Alliance.  http://sites.google.com/site/handmadetoyalliance/   You can vote here or get info on contacting Congress about this matter. 

Save Handmade Toys From the CPSIA

http://www.change.org/ideas/view/save_handmade_toys_from_the_cpsia




Dec. 24, 2008 

SAN FRANCISCO — The makers of handcrafted toys received some holiday hope Wednesday with support from a federal agency for proposed exemptions from strict lead-testing regulations they feared could put them out of business.

 

Last year's discovery of lead paint in mass-market toys prompted the government to pass new safety rules requiring testing and labeling that mom-and-pop workshops and retailers said they could not afford.  As a February deadline for complying with the law loomed, toy makers who use materials such as unfinished wood, organic cotton and beeswax sought exemptions from the rules.

 

In a memo released Wednesday, Consumer Product Safety Commission staffers recommended that the agency exempt some natural materials from the lead testing requirements.

 

"I think this is definitely a step in the right direction and would provide substantial and enormous relief to our manufacturers," said Dan Marshall, co-owner of Peapods Natural Toys and Baby Care in St. Paul, Minn.

Marshall and nearly 100 other toy stores and makers formed the Handmade Toy Alliance to ask lawmakers to exempt small toy companies from testing and labeling rules.

 

Staff toxicologists at the product safety commission told agency commissioners in the memo that some unfinished natural materials should be considered lead free. The materials include wood and fibers such as cotton, silk, wool, hemp, flax and linen.

 

The safety commission still must vote on the recommendations.

Small toy makers strongly back the restrictions in the bill, which they say reflect voluntary standards they have long observed to keep harmful substances out of toys. But they never thought their products would be considered a threat.

 

Under the law, all children's products must be tested for lead and other harmful substances. Toy makers are required to pay a third-party lab for the testing and to put tracking labels on all toys to show when and where they were made.  Those requirements make sense for a multinational toy manufacturer churning out thousands of plastic toys on an overseas assembly line, said Marshall.

 

But a business that makes, for example, a few hundred handcrafted wooden baby rattles each year cannot afford to pay up to $4,000 per product for testing, a price some toy makers have been quoted, he said.  Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., lead sponsor of the legislation, says toy makers should not worry. Rush points out that the law already exempts products and materials that do not threaten public safety or health.

 

"This exemption should be sufficient to affect most companies," Rush said in an e-mail to The Associated Press. The commission has until Jan. 5 to decide on the exemptions.